<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Saturday, January 26, 2019

Thackeray 



The Making Of A Leader

There is a scene in Abhijit Phanse’s Thackeray, in which the leader is a pall-bearer of one of his followers killed in a violent agitation. This simple act of solidarity with the rank and file explains a lot about what turned a cartoonist and journalist into one of the most controversial leaders of Maharashtra.
The slim, bespectacled Bal Thackeray (played almost perfectly by Nawazuddin Siddiqui) , who quit his job with a newspaper when asked to tone down his political cartoons, notes (an animated sequence illustrates this) that Maharashtrians are discriminated against in their native land by “outsiders.”  His Marathi Manoos plank became his springboard for forming the Shiv Sena and becoming a loud, vocal and often violent upholder of the Marathi and Hindu cause.
The biopic has been produced by a Shiv Sainik, so it is only to be expected that the film will not have even a smidgen of criticism of Thackeray’s methods or incendiary utterings. It opens with his arrival in court to testify in a trial after the demolition of the Babri Masjid; the story of his rise is then told in black-and-white flashbacks—cutting to the present to allow him to verbally slash at the sneering prosecutor.
The script has picked incidents from his political career that show him in the best light; he was always a great orator with the right quip at the ready—whether it was something as minor as having Dada Kondke’s Marathi film get its place in a theatre showing the Hindi Tere Mere Sapne, or major political milestones in his political journey—limited though it was to Maharashtra.
The film does not attempt to whitewash his politics or canonise Thackeray; in fact his methods of using violence and unleashing his men to deal with any obstacle—a hostile political rival, the campaign to reserve jobs for locals, or the digging up of a cricket pitch to prevent matches with Pakistan—are shown with a tinge of admiration. Thackeray is shown to fearlessly say it like it is, make brazenly rabble-rousing speeches, and go against the hypocritical image of a leader as saint, by smoking and drinking openly.  His personal life is limited to a few scenes when his wife Meena (Amrita Rao), who is mostly seen hovering in the background, with serving trays.
Unlike a few other recent biopics, Thackeray is very well-made with meticulous period details and casting so correct that the characters can easily be identified. It can be called propagandist, but at least it cannot be accused of being tacky. There is a distinct possibility of a sequel, because a “To be continued”  appears at the end.

Manikarnika 


Comic Book History


If a film buff wants to see a properly researched and authentic film on the Rani of Jhansi, then Sohrab Modi's Jhansi Ki Rani (1953) is the one to catch. The new Manikarnika is like a comic book version of the warrior queen's stirring story.

The ‘Khoob ladi mardani’ aspect of the Rani of Jhansi is part of Indian consciousness, since she is just about the only female leader of her time who has made it to the history books. 
If a film is made about her, it should either be faithful to history, or there should be some fresh perspective added to it, to make the effort and expense worthwhile. 
Unfortunately,Manikarnika: The Queen Of Jhansi, directed by Kangana Ranaut and Radha Krishna Jagarlamudi (she took over after he left the film, so it’s not clear who did what) does neither; just manages a lot of patriotic flag-waving.
The first half is all romance, glitter, flying hair and trailing pallus in Sanjay Leela Bhansali mode, as the horse-riding, tiger-killing Manikarnika (Kangana Ranaut) is married to the dancing, bangle-wearing King Gangadhar Rao of Jhansi (Jisshu Sengupta). 
The British East India Company has already made inroads into India and is annexing kingdoms; when they visit Jhansi, the new queen, renamed Lakshmibai, speaks to them in English and refuses to bow her head. Later, she tries to become a people’s queen by dancing with the low-caste villagers, after saving a calf from being devoured by the British, which turns its owner Jhalkari (Ankita Lokhande) into a staunch follower.
The Rani’s firstborn dies, followed soon after by her husband.  In one of the film’s best sequences, she refuses to wear white or shave her head. She adopts a child, decides to rule Jhansi and fight the British. 
In the second half, when the Mutiny of 1857 simmers, the Brits get nasty and Hugh Rose (Richard Keep) swears to hang the queen from a tree and then dismember her,  Lakshmibai gathers her meagre forces, trains the women to fight and uses the metal collected by them to make weapons.  
In spite of being outnumbered, the people of Jhansi fight to the finish, requiring her to go to Gwalior and regroup, also changing costume from nine-yard sari to male armour. The battle scenes, energetically shot though they are, reduce the queen to a slash-and-shoot action figure, who stops just to utter some deshbhakti lines before plunging into battle again.
She dominates the film, which is completely without subtlety or nuance. Other characters like the treacherous Sadashiv Rao (Mohammad Zeeshan Ayyub), Ghaus Khan (Danny Denzongpa) or Tatya Tope (Atul Kulkarni) are given nothing much to do. Kangana Ranaut’s presence and enthusiasm are remarkable, more than her one-note performance. Mostly, she glowers, bares her teeth and spouts rhetoric. 



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

eXTReMe Tracker